|
Tell us what you think about the Diana inquest.
Is it too long after the tragic event?
Is anyone interested now?
Will justice be done?
Will it discover if there really was a plot?
Will it discover whether wearing a seat belt would have made a difference?
Email your comments here. We will publish everything that meets our editor’s criteria on this page, and will not disclose your email address. We get comments from all over the world, so tell us where you are calling from. We will only show first names (e.g. “From John in Canada”, “Betty - Surrey, UK”)
===========================================================
mohammad al fayad needs medical help who will he accuse next, father christmas? he should be sued for the slanderous comments and accusations that drip off his tongue. he exhibits all the signs of a social climber thwarted in his machinations. the man is making a fool of himself.
joanne - london
===========================================================
what most people don't seem to realise is that the vast majority of people don't want it to be proved a conspiracy. it's called collective denial and is as present here as it was after kennedy.
it operates on a sub-conscious level where people realise that if a conspiracy of this nature was proven and more importantly accepted there would have to be radical change and upheaval. People are actually terrified of their own country's name being destroyed as well as their economic security threatened.
that is what this inquest is really about, and not whether these people were murdered or not.
Passive or Collective Denial is a vital element to any conspiracy or assassination and has been written about since the Roman times.
jonathan in canada
============================================================
It is a very long time since Princess Diana Died , she should be left in peace. I hope Diana's inquest will help to answer a difficult questions about her death and finish all this nonsence made by some people.
Anna
=========================================
the woman used the pres when it was beneficial to her ( like a lot of people in the public eye ) and I think this is just a case, unfortunately of a car accident that happens to many people, plus if she was the cleaver person so many think she was and the security training she would have got from place, why was she not wearing a seat belt ?
===========================================================
having just read all the emails regarding the truth about diana's death, i have to say it really opened my eyes! when the tradgerdy happend i to, thought there was conspircay behind it and have felt that way to this day!
for me the one thing that stands out above all, is, why has there never been a conclusion to this fatality????? we have the best 'supposedly' ivestgative system accross most of the world and we have prisoned all guilty offenders, why is there a problem with this one??????????????
=========================================
Time should not come into it, how many persons would have been hung (if hanging hadn't been banned) to be later cleared because of new evidence, and released. If time takes forever to clear the white wash, it won't be too long for me if the truth comes out. Sharon
=====================================================
|
I returned from my hen-night to discover that Diana was seriously injured and when I awoke The people's Princess was dead.
The immediate reaction we all felt was shock, then we all tried to find someone to blame, yet all the way through the media circus and the claims of conspiracy we seemed to forget about Diana's children.
I cannot even begin to imagine how those poor boys felt at losing their mother at such a young age, let alone how they managed the claims being casually thrown around. My husband and I got married on the day of Diana's funeral and prayers were said for the wellbeing of William and Harry instead of prayers for us. Later, I laid part of my bouquet at the gates of Sandringham and both my husband and myself stood there looking over the sea of petals and messages and cried - neither of us are emotional people in that way, but the enormity of the sadness of the Country was overwhelming.
I began by thinking that Diana's death could not have been just an accident, but as the years have passed, common sense has had time to creep back into my mind over it all and I now believe that it was just an almighty tragedy.
The day Diana died, the world became a bleaker place - she offered herself as a symbol of hope to millions and even in her death was still the monachy's saviour. Her son William will go on to be King one day, and Harry will no doubt do his mother proud.
We will never be told the entire truth of what happened to cause the accident and it's aftermath, and I think it should now be left to the pages of history and we should remember Diana for the person she was, not for the tabloid gossip.
Ruth Kerrison, Norfolk, England
|
===========================================================
There is one thing that the inquest has not covered and that is when John F Kennedy was tragically Assassinated they put up a lighted torch in Deli Plaza the sign of the Illuminated ones. Above the tunnel along the Seine River at the Pont de l'Alma bridge where Diana was killed there is a recently built fountain with a lighted torch set upon it. Secret language for the ones who know what really occurred.
Find out who commissioned that fountain and you might get closer to the truth... Robert
===========================================================
Short and sweet, BORING. Never mind some people have to do something to pay for their old age. As usual it's the media and legal professions at the expense of the workers.
===========================================================
I have waited watched and listened to all the spectulations rumours call it what you wish, we will never be told the real truth not matter what happens and the fact that there is an inquest will change nothing, dark forces do exist and the story just sells news papers, we are controlled in our every day lives.
Had Diane lived and done as speculated it becomes obvoius that the establishment or men in grey would react against it, the only ones that have got thier own way after all thats happened in all this time are Charles and Camilla.
If , and I doubt that she was, Diana had been pregnant, my opinon is that it was xxxx’s child ........................... Dodi fitted in beautifully..................... the rest sticks out like the nose on your face!!!! .
===========================================================
How typical of Government and Royals to cover things up. They have done so for thousands of years and will continue to do so unless someone knocks them off their perch of importance. It's sickening to think this as been one cover up from the day the princess died. Royal protocol stinks and it's time they woke up to the real world. It's a well known fact that in all countries things are hidden and swept under the carpet. Diana may have had her faults like we all do, but she didn't deserve to be treated this way either in life or death. As for the press, well, what can one say? All they want is a story and they will kill to get one....
===========================================================
AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE TUNNEL THE ROADWAY APPEARS TO DROP. THIS WOULD CAUSE A SHORT PERIOD OF WEIGHTLESSNESS BEFORE THE CAR SETTLES BACK ON ITS SUSPENSION. AT THIS POINT THE BRAKES WOULD BE INEFFECTIVE AS THE TYRES HAVE LITTLE GRIP ON THE ROAD. I HAVE EXPERIENCED THIS MYSELF ON TWO OCCASIONS. THE STEERING WOULD ALSO BE COMPROMISED. HIGH SPEED AND A HEAVY VEHICLE MAKES THE SITUATION WORSE. THE DRIVER BEING BLINDED BY THE FLASH FROM A CAMERA AT THIS CRITICAL MOMENT COULD BE FATAL.
REGARDS JOHN DALY -- DURBAN -- SOUTH AFRICA
===========================================================
I doubt that the inquest will show that the accident was nothing more than that, however, there are many of us who believe it was an organised crime.
There is one thing in the photos shown that I keep thinking about and that is; why does a man stop and tie up both shoe laces when he has been walking in his shoes for possibly hours. There could be two reasons, one was that he went to have a shower to 'sober up' before driving the couple away and forgot to do up his laces, the other was that it was a code. One shoe for the front door and both shoes for the back door!!
I have been married twice, the second time for over 30 years. I have never known my husband stop and re tie his shoe laces. Possible one might become loose but both??? Not a very big revelation to the case but then that is why the real verdict of the couple's death cannot be proved to be anything other than an accident. Most intelligent agencies can carry these acts out without being caught as the methods they use for communication are everyday activities and therefore go unnoticed. This is why the tying of the shoe laces and the wave at the back door should be looked into further.
P Izatt
===========================================================
Diana was a cousin through marital links. We never met, although I have met many of the royals. Unless real and reliable incriminating evidence is brought to light we will never know wheter Diana's death was murder or an accident.
Regards Keith Harris editor www.newsmedianews.com
===========================================================
In 'Diana: The Last Days' by Martyn Gregory, on p 252-3 of my edition (Virgin, 2000), the author writes, 'The truth is that Princess Diana died because of Dodi's decision to put a drunk, drugged and unqualified driver in charge of a car which was driven dangerously and which subsequently crashed at speed. Dodi told Kez Wingfield and Trevor Rees-Jones (his two security guards) that his father had authorised the plan. There has been virtually no media focus on this central factor in the death of the Princess.'
Mr Gregory points out that contrary to popular belief Mr Ree-Jones was not wearing his seat belt. He was badly injured but his life was saved by the passenger airbag.
Regards, Michael
===========================================================
To anyone watching the “progress” of the ten year old inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, it must be amazing that taxpayers money is being spent in carrying the jurors on a pointless visit to Paris.
Included is a visit to the tunnel where the car crashed, and where all they can see is the damage to the concrete pillar into which the car crashed.
Mohamed al Fayad is claiming that Diana’s death was an act of murder perpetrated by members of the Royal family. What a wayout method of murder, since no-one knew beforehand that the car was to pass through the tunnel.
No – the person responsible for the death was clearly Dodi Fayad, with his father as a contributer. Dodi did not murder Diana, but he killed her (and himself and driver) by negligent homicide. The Mercedes was under the control of Dodi. It is true that Henri Paul was at the wheel, but he was acting on Dodi’s orders. If Dodi had not been in such a hurry to get Diana to his apartment, he could have, in fact should have, ordered the driver to slow down, particularly in going through the tunnel, and the accident would not have happened. He did not even insist the seat belts be used. His father contributed to the accident by bringing up his son to be a dare-devil playboy, and being himself one to gain by the romance between Dodi and Diana.
John
Saint Augustine, Florida, USA
===========================================================
ten years from now the hype will still be there as to how she died .No matter what the outcome .Why has it taken this long for an inquest it,s a farce .Let Dianna rest in peace we will never know how it happened or why so lets stop waisting time and money she herself would have rather seen the money spent on her charities .
ann
===========================================================
The message posted by John from Aust "Not wearing a seat belt" !!- it's remarkable how naive some people are. Accident my foot, this was a calculated event.
How about the official story be changed when the car manufacturer challenged the speedometer being 'stuck' on 100kph, or the fact the Diana took an excessively long time to reach a nearby hospital or the crash site was completely cleaned up by 7am the next day, or traffic cameras apparently were not working , or innocent bystanders first on the scene were silenced, or the driver being intoxicated when video of him minutes earlier shows the exact opposite. Just think for a moment who has the power to control these things?
This is a conspiracy of the highest magnitude no matter what the inquest says or finds.
If 'they' can pull this off in front of the eyes of the world with such a high profile figure, imagine what they can do with the findings of an inquest 10 years down the track!
RIP Diana
Derek
Sydney
( not everyone thinks like a Robert)
============================================================
Dear editor,
Princess Diana died because she was not wearing a seatbelt. The car was doing 100 kph when it hit the pillar and stopped in a fraction of a second. She did not. She hit the back of the front seat at 100 kph. The car was not at fault. The passenger cell worked the way it should, the doors could be opened and shut. The only survivor in the car was wearing a seatbelt. Research into seatbelts began 50 years ago and the films made then of unrestrained dummies in crashes show exactly what happens to them. Diana chose not to do up her seatbelt.
Cheers
Robert, Australia
|
